Create judgement of virtuous challenge - Revision history

Matt: Text replacement - "[[Imperial Synod" to "[[Synod"

2026-01-15T12:39:24Z

Text replacement - "[[Imperial Synod" to "[[Synod"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 15 January 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	==Overview==		==Overview==
	* The motion proposes a new [[judgement]] available to the [[~~Imperial~~ Synod]]		* The motion proposes a new [[judgement]] available to the [[Synod]]
	* Passed		* Passed
	==Date==		==Date==

Rafferty: /* Constitution */

2022-09-20T12:01:15Z

Constitution

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 20 September 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==Constitution==		==Constitution==
	This new judgement was the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they considered its implications and applications. After much deliberation, they determined that [[the Throne]], while it is a title with tenure, is not subject to the judgement of challenge.		This new judgement was the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they considered its implications and applications. After much deliberation, they determined that [[the Throne]], while it is a title with tenure, is not subject to the judgement of challenge. They also expressed some concern about the stipulation that the appointment or election of a title successfully challenged would be delayed until the following summit. In the end, they determined to keep this provision in place, but with an eye towards observing the new judgement in practice and determining if this restriction was unnecessarily disruptive.

Rafferty: /* Constitution */

2022-09-20T11:59:30Z

Constitution

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 20 September 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==Constitution==		==Constitution==
	This new judgement is the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they ~~consider~~ its implications and applications.		This new judgement was the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they considered its implications and applications. After much deliberation, they determined that [[the Throne]], while it is a title with tenure, is not subject to the judgement of challenge.

Rafferty: /* Outcome */

2022-09-20T11:58:36Z

Outcome

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 20 September 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* As proposed, the new judgement would allow an [[Imperial title]] with [[tenure]] to be challenged; if the judgement was upheld then that title would be raised for election at the following summit.		* As proposed, the new judgement would allow an [[Imperial title]] with [[tenure]] to be challenged; if the judgement was upheld then that title would be raised for election at the following summit.
	* The judgement would only be raised in an assembly that was capable of [[revocation\|revoking]] the title in question.		* The judgement would only be raised in an assembly that was capable of [[revocation\|revoking]] the title in question.
	* ~~Should~~ the judgement be upheld, the title could not be subject to virtuous challenge again until a year had passed, but they might still be subject to revocation		* Regardless of whether the judgement is upheld, the title could not be subject to virtuous challenge again until a year had passed, but they might still be subject to revocation

	==Constitution==		==Constitution==
	This new judgement is the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they consider its implications and applications.		This new judgement is the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they consider its implications and applications.

Rafferty: Created page with "Category:Senate MotionCategory: 384YE Autumn NOTOC The Senate creates the new Synod Judgement of Virtuous Challenge..."

2022-09-13T11:56:50Z

Created page with "Category:Senate Motion Category: 384YE Autumn __NOTOC__ <quote by="Proposed Conscience, Seconded Karov">The Senate creates the new Synod Judgement of Virtuous Challenge..."

New page

[[Category:Senate Motion]][[Category: 384YE Autumn]]
__NOTOC__
<quote by="Proposed Conscience, Seconded Karov">The Senate creates the new Synod Judgement of Virtuous Challenge. A Judgement of Virtuous Challenge may be raised against a Tenured Imperial Title where a priest believes there is a citizen whose Virtues, or vision for that titled position, are superior to the incumbent's. The Assembly raising the Judgement must have oversight of that titled position. If the Judgement is upheld the position will be eligible for election at the following summit. The incumbent remains in post until that time. Any Tenured Imperial Title that has been challenged in this way may not be the subject of another such challenge until a year has passed but the title holder may still be Revoked in that time.</quote>

==Overview==
* The motion proposes a new [[judgement]] available to the [[Imperial Synod]]
* Passed
==Date==
* Autumn 384YE.
==Outcome==
* As proposed, the new judgement would allow an [[Imperial title]] with [[tenure]] to be challenged; if the judgement was upheld then that title would be raised for election at the following summit.
* The judgement would only be raised in an assembly that was capable of [[revocation|revoking]] the title in question.
* Should the judgement be upheld, the title could not be subject to virtuous challenge again until a year had passed, but they might still be subject to revocation
==Constitution==
This new judgement is the subject of extended [[scrutiny]] by the Constitutional Court as they consider its implications and applications.

Create judgement of virtuous challenge - Revision history

Matt: Text replacement - "[[Imperial Synod" to "[[Synod"

Rafferty: /* Constitution */

Rafferty: /* Constitution */

Rafferty: /* Outcome */

Rafferty: Created page with "Category:Senate MotionCategory: 384YE Autumn __NOTOC__ The Senate creates the new Synod Judgement of Virtuous Challenge..."

Rafferty: Created page with "Category:Senate MotionCategory: 384YE Autumn NOTOC The Senate creates the new Synod Judgement of Virtuous Challenge..."