(Created page with "{{Scrutiny}} <ic>To make the act of Annihilation – defined as destroying or, endangering with destruction, a human soul – a crime under Imperial Law. <br><br>Proposed by ...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Scrutiny}}
[[Category:Senate Motion]][[Category:380YE Spring]]
__NOTOC__
<ic>To make the act of Annihilation – defined as destroying or, endangering with destruction, a human soul – a crime under Imperial Law.
<ic>To make the act of Annihilation – defined as destroying or, endangering with destruction, a human soul – a crime under Imperial Law.


Line 12: Line 13:


===Campaign Outcome===
===Campaign Outcome===
* The prohibition against destroying human souls has been [[List of Criminal Offences|added to Imperial law]].
* This law requires additional definition before it can be enforced.


[[Category: Senate Motion]]
===Constitution===
* There is some concern that this crime is not defined in such a way that a conviction can ever be secured; it is being reviewed by the Constitutional court and the Magistrates.
* The magistrates will work with the Senator for Semmerholm to secure a definition of this crime that they believe is enforcable, then present their findings to the Senate for approval as an administrative motion.
 
<!-- Basically we need to be able to say definitively if the crime has happened (as with heresy, blasphemy, and idolatory). In the absence of proof of the existance of a soul, we need to be very careful about this crime !-->

Latest revision as of 19:10, 3 February 2022


To make the act of Annihilation – defined as destroying or, endangering with destruction, a human soul – a crime under Imperial Law.

Proposed by Semmerholm, seconded by Holberg.

Overview

  • Creating a law making it illegal to destroy a human soul.
  • Passed

Date

  • Spring 380YE

Campaign Outcome

  • This law requires additional definition before it can be enforced.

Constitution

  • There is some concern that this crime is not defined in such a way that a conviction can ever be secured; it is being reviewed by the Constitutional court and the Magistrates.
  • The magistrates will work with the Senator for Semmerholm to secure a definition of this crime that they believe is enforcable, then present their findings to the Senate for approval as an administrative motion.